If you are confused about purchasing the TaylorMade M2 driver or M4 should read this article. This article will provide you a brief description and comparison of TaylorMade m2 vs m4 Driver. It will also help you in the purchasing of drivers.
The TaylorMade m2 vs m4 driver indicates the designers have come up with changes. I miss plastic on these irons and think of these iron game development variations and parallels.
TaylorMade launched M4, shortly before the launch of the 2017 M2 Irons. Both iron flights on paper appear almost similar, making a perfectly straight flight with distance and forgiveness.
A closer glance at the iron TaylorMade m2 vs m4 driver in 2017 reveals the developers’ progress. I take off the plastic on these irons and explore their variations and similitudes.
Table of Contents
TaylorMade M2 Driver
For people who are looking for a driver that has advanced technology and more practical then TaylorMade M2 is perfect for these users. The M2 driver gives the golfer with GeocousticTM technology a degree of distance and forgiveness.
The driver effectively increases the standard of architecture and innovation, continuing its parent’s footsteps, with the reinvestment of multi-material construction and innovative architectural modeling. The TaylorMade 6400cc M2 driver introduces a new Speed Pocket three times as robust as in the initial M2, in tandem with the geocentric style.
The latest 9-1-1 low-density titanium, 6-layer carbon tuning, and limited ribs require a discretionary weight of 25 g to be shifted back and forth in the club sole. In combination with these applications, the total inertia of the M2 driver may be improved without losing low CG, heat, or aerodynamic efficiency.
- Simple and beautiful in looking
- Beautiful solid sound
- High handicapper and it’s forgiving
- Massive sweet spot
- Loft Adjustability
- Similar technology like M1
TaylorMade M4 Driver
Now I’m going to tell you about the TaylorMade M4 driver, which is most effective and recommended. In TaylorMade M4, the greatest attraction is that I feel the Twist Face is a tremendous benefit to amateurs. The M4 has a warm smile and a pleasant feeling, whether you are dead on the screw every time. The Twist Face has protected us as humans who deviate from the middle and can use some support.
The M4 is incredibly strong and is useful for my best take-off. My daily cheek miss saw even less pain and put me in a healthier place than normal. I feel now more positive about the result of this stuff. That’s a significant bonus in the golf course if you’re anything like me.
- High price
- Not suitable for better players with a high swing speed
Comparison Of Taylormade M2 And M4 Driver:
In the comparison, the first property which I’m are going to tell you about is the look and appearance of both the drivers. They look just the same in terms of head size. All of them are good and tall, and I guess that is one of the key reasons I decided to choose the M2 last year because I was still satisfied with the hit.
Compared to both the white coating on the M2, the M4 has a silver-grey coating, so I can’t even recall the one I guess. The M4 seems a bit better and more professional, but I just appreciate the white and the black.
The most significant improvement between the TaylorMade m2 & m4 driver that Irons 2017 is the RIBCOR developments for M4 Irons. RIBCOR technology consists of two vertical bars (4-7 irons) that tighten your head and make your face more flexible. The extra face-flexing channels more energy into a golf shot, bringing the Irons “solid drive” as TaylorMade names.
The weight and location of the RIBCOR bars on the front also improves the club’s MOI (forgiveness). The MOI of iron M4 is 24 % higher, according to TaylorMade than iron M2 in 2017.
The RIBCOR bars are positioned behind the recognizable facial holes, seen on TaylorMade’s many decades of iron enhancement. Both M2 and M4 irons in 2017 have the same side positions, resulting in higher speeds of the ball on the pitch or the head. As a result, you get more distance and forgiveness.
Both heads were 9.5˚, and I used the same Project X Hzrdus Yellow shaft that I had in my M2 last year for both drivers.
The M4 irons have a speed pocket on the sole as it has been with the TaylorMade Irons. The Speed Pocket increases the pace of the ball and especially on the club surface. On the M4 irons compared to the stump shape of the M2, the speed pocket is revamped into a slimmer, wider, curved pattern. This makes the pocket smoother and blunter to maintain ball pace; it looks a little cleaner.
Fluted Hosel 2.0:
The next property is Fluted Hosel 2.0. The fluted hosel was broad and thin, with a weight of 2 grams relative to the earlier variant of the M2 iron of 2017. I realize that sounds unimportant, but it certainly added to the angle of redemption and start. In the M4 Iron, the latest fluted hosel 2.0 shafts still more weight, placed small, so the extra weight of RIBCOR can be compensated. Iron shots with the M4 rockets up and down the CG spot forever.
Another property is the Shaft movement. The choices for the stock shaft have modified for the M4 irons. In the 6400cc M2, TaylorMade abandoned the Reax shafts, updated them to the luxury KBS shafts and Fujikura. The KBS Max 85 steel has comparable weight/launch characteristics to the 2017M2 Reax 88HL. The red graphite shaft in the Fujikura M4 is marginally heavier than its stock graphite shaft in the M3 for 2017.
TaylorMade m2 vs m4 driver comparison proves to us that the M4 test gives longer distance and better precision. The difference is not attributed to a higher ball speed but a marginally higher volume; the original angle was 1 degree greater, which corresponds to a little more traffic in a corresponding breeze. Provided the same ball speeds of the two drivers, we may assume that the M4 will not necessarily raise the distance from the M2.
If the player likes to use M2 rather than M4. Then there is a big NO, in case if a player wants more accuracy and more distance. The M4 has a distinct tone from the M2, which may affect the decision as well.